Skip to main content

Saudi Gastroenterology Association · Open course

Calculators

Short calculators for the core calculations in this course. Move the sliders and watch the result change. Default numbers are illustrative.

ICER and cost-effectiveness verdict

Incremental cost per QALY gained, compared with a willingness-to-pay threshold.

ICER = (Cost_new − Cost_comp) ÷ (QALY_new − QALY_comp)

Linked module: Economic evaluation: costs, QALYs and the ICER

Incremental cost

SAR 90,000

Incremental QALYs

0.45

ICER per QALY

SAR 200,000

Above the threshold

The ICER is a model output. Check the horizon, perspective, discount rate and the certainty of the effect estimate before using it.

Net monetary and net health benefit

A decision rule that never divides by a small number. Positive means the technology is worth its price at this threshold.

INMB = (ΔQALY × λ) − ΔCost INHB = ΔQALY − (ΔCost ÷ λ)

Linked module: Economic evaluation: costs, QALYs and the ICER

Net monetary benefit

SAR -22,500

Net health benefit (QALYs)

-0.150

At this threshold the extra cost buys less health than the same money would elsewhere.

Threshold price: what price reaches the threshold?

The maximum total cost per patient at which the ICER equals your threshold, and the discount that implies.

Max total cost = Cost_comp + (ΔQALY × λ)

Linked module: Economic evaluation: costs, QALYs and the ICER

Maximum acceptable total cost

SAR 117,500

Proposed total cost

SAR 140,000

Discount needed

16.1%

Any discount smaller than this leaves the ICER above the threshold.

Three-year budget impact

Eligible patients × uptake × net incremental cost per patient-year, year by year.

BI_t = Population × Uptake_t × (Cost_new − Cost_comp − Offsets)

Linked module: Budget impact and affordability

Net cost per treated patient-year

SAR 8,000

Year 1

SAR 4,000,000

Year 2

SAR 8,000,000

Year 3

SAR 12,000,000

Three-year total

SAR 24,000,000

Budget impact is not discounted and covers only the payer’s own budget. Savings that fall outside the horizon or the budget do not count.

Biosimilar switch savings

Annual savings from moving patients to a lower-priced biosimilar, and how many more patients that could fund.

Savings = Patients × Switch rate × Originator cost × Discount

Linked module: Budget impact and affordability

Annual savings

SAR 14,112,000

Biosimilar annual cost

SAR 31,200

Additional patients fundable

452

Savings are real only if tenders deliver the lower price and the switch actually happens.

Discounting to present value

A cost or QALY in the future is worth less than the same amount now. Use the same rate for costs and health unless the guideline says otherwise.

PV = FV ÷ (1 + r)^t

Linked module: Economic evaluation: costs, QALYs and the ICER

Present value

7,441

Value lost to discounting

2,559

QALY gain from a sustained remission

Quality-adjusted life years from a utility improvement over a number of years, with optional discounting.

QALY gain = (u_with − u_without) × Σ years (discounted)

Linked module: Economic evaluation: costs, QALYs and the ICER

Undiscounted QALY gain

0.60

Discounted QALY gain

0.57

Utility 1 is full health and 0 is death. Utilities should come from a source that matches your patients.

Number needed to treat and cost per extra responder

Turns a difference in response rates into an effect size a budget-holder can use.

NNT = 1 ÷ (response_new − response_comp); cost per extra responder = NNT × cost per patient-course

Linked module: Clinical evidence: synthesis, indirect comparison and certainty

Absolute difference

14.0%

NNT

7.1

Cost per extra responder

SAR 214,286

Compare this figure with what the system would pay for one more patient in remission, but remember that response is a surrogate for QALYs.

Cost per additional detection (AI-assisted endoscopy)

What a detection-improving tool costs for each extra procedure that finds a lesion.

Cost per extra detection = Annual cost ÷ (Procedures × (rate_with − rate_without))

Linked module: Devices, diagnostics and AI

Extra procedures with a detection

240

Cost per extra detection

SAR 833

This is a process measure. Value depends on whether the extra detections prevent cancer and what extra surveillance they trigger.

Method and terminology adapted from the HTA Society (HTAA) platform, which describes its own content as draft and pending board approval. SGA authored the GI examples and figures here; HTAA has not reviewed them. HTAA platform

Educational content only. Figures in examples, calculators and simulators are illustrative — they are not Saudi price or cost data and do not represent any coverage, pricing or official policy decision.

Share this