Skip to main content
SGA EndoFLIP Certification Course
Unit A · Foundations — Why FLIP?Module 1

Foundations & Indications for FLIP

Impedance planimetry physics, history, and a tour of the clinical use cases

45 min4 learning outcomes3 MCQs

Learning outcomes

  • 1

    Define impedance planimetry and explain how FLIP measures 16 cross-sectional areas and intra-bag pressure simultaneously

    Understand
  • 2

    Calculate the distensibility index (DI = CSA / pressure) and interpret the difference between DI, CSA, and pressure

    Apply
  • 3

    List the eight validated FLIP indications: achalasia confirmation, EGJ-OO, intraoperative POEM/Heller/fundoplication/sleeve, G-POEM selection, EsoFLIP dilation, and post-treatment surveillance

    Remember
  • 4

    Differentiate FLIP from HRM, barium swallow, and timed-barium oesophagram in the EGJ-outflow obstruction workup

    Analyze

Pre-reading anchors

  • Savarino E, di Pietro M, Bredenoord AJ, et al. (2020). Use of the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe in Clinical Esophagology. Am J Gastroenterol 115(11):1786-1796 PMID 32453044

    International expert position paper — the canonical FLIP reference document.

  • Hirano I, Pandolfino JE, Boeckxstaens GE. (2017). Functional Lumen Imaging Probe for the Management of Esophageal Disorders: Expert Review from the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the AGA Institute. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(3):325-334 PMID 28212976

A short history of impedance planimetry

The technique was first described by McMahon and Gregersen in the late 1990s, applying impedance-based luminal measurement to anorectal and oesophageal models. The probe was commercialised as EndoFLIP (Crospon, later Medtronic) in the early 2010s, with the EF-322N (8 cm balloon) catheter dominating EGJ work and the EF-325N (16 cm) introduced for full-oesophageal panometry. The therapeutic sibling — EsoFLIP — was approved for controlled radial dilation in 2017. Today, more than 600 published clinical studies underpin the technique, and major societies (AGA, ASGE, ESNM) have integrated FLIP into their motility guidelines.

The physics — how DI is actually measured

A FLIP catheter carries 17 ring electrodes spaced 1 cm apart, forming 16 paired impedance segments. The balloon is filled with a conductive saline solution. As current flows between each adjacent electrode pair, the device measures impedance — which, by Ohm's law in a fluid of known conductivity, is inversely proportional to cross-sectional area (CSA). A solid-state strain-gauge pressure transducer sits inside the balloon tip and reports intra-bag pressure simultaneously.

For each fill volume (typically 30, 40, 50, and 60 mL), the system reports CSA at the narrowest segment and the corresponding intra-bag pressure. The distensibility index is simply the ratio: DI = CSA (mm²) / pressure (mmHg). A normal EGJ at 60 mL fill yields CSA ≈ 90–160 mm² and pressure ≈ 25–35 mmHg — giving DI ≈ 3–6. A tight, non-distending achalasic EGJ at 60 mL might yield CSA ≈ 30 mm² and pressure ≈ 40 mmHg, giving DI ≈ 0.75 — well below the 2.0 threshold.

handle conductive saline-filled balloon 17 impedance electrodes → 16 paired CSA segments pressure transducer DI = CSA (mm²) ÷ intra-bag pressure (mmHg) measured 4× per second at each fill volume (30 / 40 / 50 / 60 mL)
Figure 1.1 — FLIP catheter anatomy. 17 impedance electrodes form 16 paired segments; a pressure transducer at the tip reports intra-bag pressure. DI = narrowest CSA ÷ pressure.

Why DI, not CSA or pressure alone

CSA alone is misleading — a wide opening at very high pressure can look "open" but mean nothing for swallowing. Pressure alone misses the patient with a chronically dilated, non-contractile oesophagus. DI fuses both: it asks, for a given pressure load, how much does the sphincter actually let through? That single ratio outperforms either component in predicting clinical outcomes after POEM, Heller, fundoplication, and pneumatic dilation. The Carlson 2015 validation cohort showed DI correlated with symptomatic outcome (r = 0.71) while CSA and pressure individually correlated at r = 0.42 and r = 0.38 respectively.

The eight indications

FLIP earns its bench space because it answers questions other tests cannot. The validated indications are:

(1) Confirm achalasia when HRM is inconclusive or normal but symptoms persist. (2) Subtype achalasia in conjunction with FLIP topography panometry. (3) Distinguish EGJ outflow obstruction from mechanical or motility mimics. (4) Guide intraoperative POEM — adjust myotomy length to a target DI of 6–9. (5) Tailor fundoplication tightness during Nissen/Toupet/Dor (target DI 2–3.5). (6) Assess incisural distensibility during sleeve gastrectomy to predict post-op reflux. (7) Select refractory gastroparesis patients for G-POEM using pyloric DI < 9–10. (8) Deliver therapeutic dilation via EsoFLIP with real-time CSA feedback in achalasia and post-fundoplication dysphagia.

FLIP indication? Diagnostic — EGJ 1. Confirm achalasia (HRM unclear) 2. Subtype with panometry 3. EGJ-OO vs mimics Intraoperative 4. POEM — target DI 6–9 5. Nissen — target DI 2–3.5 6. Sleeve incisura check Pyloric & therapy 7. G-POEM selection (DI < 10) 8. EsoFLIP dilation (achalasia, post-fundo) Test selection — quick reference • HRM still first-line for motility diagnosis (Chicago v4.0). • FLIP adds value when HRM is borderline / inconclusive or as same-session adjunct during endoscopy. • Timed barium oesophagram complementary for emptying assessment after therapy. • Always interpret FLIP as DI + topography + clinical context, never any single value in isolation.
Figure 1.2 — The FLIP decision tree across the eight validated clinical indications.
The DI is the headline number

When in doubt, ask: what is the distensibility index at 60 mL? It is the single most decision-changing measurement in the entire study.

FLIP vs HRM vs barium — knowing when to pick which

HRM measures peristalsis and oesophagogastric junction relaxation during a swallow — it is unmatched for primary motility diagnosis. FLIP measures distensibility during volumetric distension at rest — it captures EGJ opening physics under load. Barium imaging measures emptying. Each answers a different question.

In practice: start with HRM. If HRM gives an unambiguous Chicago v4.0 phenotype, FLIP is optional. If HRM is borderline (IRP 10–15 mmHg), inconclusive, or in conflict with the clinical picture, FLIP at the same endoscopy session resolves the ambiguity in > 70% of cases. Timed barium oesophagram is added after therapy to assess emptying durability.

Clinical pearls

  • Always run a 50 mL and a 60 mL fill — the DI at 60 mL is the cutpoint that drives most published thresholds.
  • FLIP topography (repetitive antegrade contractions vs none vs disordered) is as informative as the DI itself for achalasia subtyping.
  • A FLIP study runs in 5–7 minutes and adds little risk to a routine endoscopy — schedule it as a same-session adjunct, not a separate visit.
  • CSA at 60 mL gives the diameter at the narrowest segment — but the DI is what predicts clinical outcome.

Pitfalls

  • A normal EGJ-DI in a clearly dysphagic patient does not exclude a motility disorder — review the topography and HRM together.
  • Reporting CSA without the corresponding pressure (and thus without DI) strips the headline number from your report — always tabulate all three.
  • Do not perform FLIP under deep paralysis — neuromuscular blockade abolishes contractile topography and limits interpretation.

Self-assessment MCQs

Q1

Which measurement is the headline number in an EGJ FLIP study?

Q2

A 51-year-old man has typical dysphagia and regurgitation. HRM shows IRP 12 mmHg (upper limit 15) and intact peristalsis. The most appropriate next step is:

Q3

Which test best assesses oesophageal EMPTYING after achalasia therapy?

Video library

Evidence corner

  • Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Lin Z, et al. (2016). Evaluation of esophageal motility utilizing the functional lumen imaging probe. Am J Gastroenterol 111(12):1726-1735 PMID 27725650

  • Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. (2021). Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 33(1):e14058 PMID 33373111

  • Savarino E, di Pietro M, Bredenoord AJ, et al. (2020). Use of the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe in Clinical Esophagology. Am J Gastroenterol 115(11):1786-1796 PMID 32453044

  • Hirano I, Pandolfino JE, Boeckxstaens GE. (2017). Functional Lumen Imaging Probe for the Management of Esophageal Disorders: AGA Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(3):325-334 PMID 28212976

  • McMahon BP, Frøkjaer JB, Liao D, et al. (2005). A new technique for evaluating sphincter function in visceral organs: application of the functional lumen imaging probe. Physiol Meas 26(5):823-836 PMID 16088074

Reflection

List the last three patients you sent for HRM. For each, would FLIP at the same endoscopy session have shortened the diagnostic path?